Usurping State/Local Power
AP says a recent Bush executive order is "in keeping with Bush's goal of having the government defer as much as possible to local interests." While that may be the White House's rhetoric, it is not its record:
RESTRICTING STATE/LOCAL POWER TO LOWER PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES: The White House is opposing bipartisan legislation to allow state/local government to purchase lower-priced, FDA-approved medicines from abroad. The administration took the extraordinary step last month of deploying federal agents to seize shipments of lower-priced medicines headed to a prominent seniors group in Minnesota - a state whose GOP governor is fighting the White House over reimportation. Vermont's GOP governor has filed a lawsuit against the Bush administration, demanding it allow states to proceed with reimportation.
RESTRICTING STATE/LOCAL POWER TO PROTECT CONSUMER PRIVACY: The President is backing banks in their legal efforts to deny California and other states to pass more stringent consumer privacy laws than the federal government has. White House allies in Congress have already passed bills aimed at restricting state rights in this area as well.
RESTRICTING STATE/LOCAL POWER TO CONTROL EDUCATION: Republican and Democratic state governments have condemned the President's No Child Left Behind Bill because it includes strict federal requirements, while not providing adequate funds for implementation. In other words, it is an unfunded federal mandate that takes away state/local control of education.
RESTRICTING STATE/LOCAL POWER TO REGULATE MARRIAGE: When running for President in 2000, George W. Bush said he believed marriage was an issue that states should regulate. Now, President Bush is pushing a federal constitutional amendment taking that power away from states and banning gay marriage.


